19 "Hijackers"

Apologies for the late post, my Internet was down for a few hours.

  Okay so, the head of Pakistani intelligence, ISI Director and General Mahmoud Ahmed wired $100,000 to accused lead hijacker Muhammed Atta about six months before the attack. The reason this money was wired was never investigated by US officials. Why would they disregard this wire transfer to supposedly the leading hijacker in the 9/11 attack? The 9/11 Commission deemed the financing of the attack was "of little practical significance" in their report, but I'll get more into that at a later post. Another fun fact, on the morning of 9/11 government officials were having breakfast with General Ahmad in Washington.
  Among the other 18 accused terrorists responsible, two of the hijackers lived with an FBI informant, and may have attended US military run schools.
  Evidence was also found blocks away from the ashed remains of the twin towers, a passport. This passport belonged to an accused hijacker. How on earth could a hijacker's passport end up blocks away from the towers perfectly in-tact? Was it planted there? I don't see how its possible for a small paperback passport to survive the crashing of a plane into and collapsing(or demolition) of the towers, and end up blocks away without a scratch.
  Accused hijacker Abdulaziz al-Omari states, "I couldn't believe it when the FBI put me on their list. They gave my name and my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane."(The Telegraph, 9/23/2001)
  According to Chief of Japan's Democratic Party, "9/11 is a hoax, the 9/11 hijackers are alive and well."(Zeitgeist)
  After testimony by accused hijackers, David Green, and other former government officials, at least seven of the 19 accused hijackers are still alive. How is this possible? How are any alive? The FBI has yet to revise their list.
 
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Another few notes about my George Bush postings:
   After the attack, Bush was to have a conference with the 9/11 commission to answer questions regarding the attacks. A few points about the conference

      -The conference was to be held on the president's terms, these terms included that Bush and VP Cheney were to appear together. They were not under oath. No friends, family members, or press could attend the conference. And no recordings of the conference were allowed of any kind.

  Why these terms? Why should they appear together, are they afraid of getting their stories mixed up? No vow of oath, and no recordings?! Wouldn't it be important for the public to review this conference?
  After the conference was held, Bush answered press questions, one of them being, "Don't the families deserve the right to see a transcript of the conference?" Bush replies with a heckling laugh, "You asked me that question yesterday, I have the same answer."